Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837682›Full record

ArticleCell journal2021

The Role of MicroRNA 143 and MicroRNA 206 in The Regulation of Apoptosis in Mouse Lukemia Cancer Cells and Spermatogonial Cells.

Azar Shams, Ronak Shabani, Mohammad Najafi, Mahdi Karimi, Vahid Pirhajati, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Hamid Reza Asgari, Chad B Maki, Seyed Mohsen Razavi, Morteza Koruji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Azar ShamsStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ronak ShabaniStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad NajafiDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi KarimiDepartment of Nanotechnology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Vahid PirhajatiNeuroscience Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Asghari JafarabadiDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Hamid Reza AsgariDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Chad B MakiVetCell Therapeutics USA, 2917 Daimler Street, Santa Ana CA 92705, USA.
Seyed Mohsen RazaviOncopathology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza KorujiStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: koruji.m@iums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn cancer treatments, smart gene delivery via nanoparticles (NPs) can be targeted for cancer cells, while concurrently minimizing damage to healthy cells. This study assessed the efficiency of poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-miR 143/206 transfection on apoptosis in mouse leukemia cancer cells (El4) and spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this experimental study, neonatal mouse spermatogonia cells and EL4 cancer cell lines were used. MicroRNA-PLGA NPs were prepared, characterized, and targeted with folate. Several doses were evaluated to obtain a suitable miR dose that can induce appropriate apoptosis in EL4 cells, while not harming SSCs. Cells were treated separately at 3 doses of each miR (for miR 143, doses of 25, 50 and 75 nmol and for miR 206, doses of 50, 100 and 150 nmol). The experiments were performed at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Viability and apoptosis were investigated by MTT and Annexin Kits.

resultsBased on MTT assay results, the optimal dose of miR 143 was 75 nmol (59.87 ± 2.85 % SSC and 35.3 ± 0.78 % EL4) (P≤0.05), and for miR 206, the optimal dose was 150 nmol (54.82 ± 6.7 % SSC and 33.92 ± 3.01% EL4) (P≤0.05). The optimal time was 48 hours. At these doses, the survival rate of the EL4 cells was below the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC

conclusionUsing intelligent transfection by NPs, we were able to induce apoptosis on EL4 cells and maintain acceptable SSC survival rates.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCancerMicroRNAPoly Lactic-Co-Glycolic AcidSmart Gene Delivery

Identifiers

PMID34837682
PMCPMC8588816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.