Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837631›Full record

ReviewGenes & genomics2022

DNA methylation and histone modifications induced by abiotic stressors in plants.

Karolina Czajka, Melanie Mehes-Smith, Kabwe Nkongolo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decoding heavy metals (CdScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The First Whole Genome Sequence and Methylation Profile ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. DDM1-Mediated TE Silencing in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Genomic perspectives on epigenetics.Genes & genomics · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karolina CzajkaBiomolecular Sciences Program, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Melanie Mehes-SmithDepartment of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Kabwe NkongoloBiomolecular Sciences Program, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada. knkongolo@laurentian.ca.
Laurentian University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA review of research shows that methylation in plants is more complex and sophisticated than in microorganisms and animals. Overall, studies on the effects of abiotic stress on epigenetic modifications in plants are still scarce and limited to few species. Epigenetic regulation of plant responses to environmental stresses has not been elucidated. This study summarizes key effects of abiotic stressors on DNA methylation and histone modifications in plants. DISCUSSION: Plant DNA methylation and histone modifications in responses to abiotic stressors varied and depended on the type and level of stress, plant tissues, age, and species. A critical analysis of the literature available revealed that 44% of the epigenetic modifications induced by abiotic stressors in plants involved DNA hypomethylation, 40% DNA hypermethylation, and 16% histone modification. The epigenetic changes in plants might be underestimated since most authors used methods such as methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP), High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and immunolabeling that are less sensitive compared to bisulfite sequencing and single-base resolution methylome analyses. More over, mechanisms underlying epigenetic changes in plants have not yet been determined since most reports showed only the level or/and distribution of DNA methylation and histone modifications.

conclusionsVarious epigenetic mechanisms are involved in response to abiotic stressors, and several of them are still unknown. Integrated analysis of the changes in the genome by omic approaches should help to identify novel components underlying mechanisms involved in DNA methylation and histone modifications associated with plant response to environmental stressors.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticDNA, PlantHistone CodePlantsDNA, PlantAbiotic stressorsDNA methylationEpigenetic change mechanismsHistone modificationPlants

Identifiers

PMID34837631
OpenAlexW3217106503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.