Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837609›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Comparison and prioritization of antibiotics in a reservoir and its inflow rivers of Beijing, China.

Jingrun Hu, Dianqing Qi, Qian Chen, Weiling Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Tegoprazan dual and quadruple therapy forFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingrun HuCollege of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Dianqing QiCollege of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Qian ChenCollege of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Weiling SunCollege of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. wlsun@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-0351

Funding

Fund from Beijing Municipal Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center BJMEMC-ZC-2019186National Natural Science Foundation of China 51925901Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai 2019-ZJ-923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of antibiotics in drinking water resources, like reservoirs, is of considerable concern due to their potential risks to ecosystem, human health, and antimicrobial resistance development. Here, we quantified 83 antibiotics in water and sediments of wet and dry seasons from the Miyun reservoir and its inflow rivers in Beijing, China. Twenty-four antibiotics were detected in water with concentrations of ND-11.6 ng/L and 19 antibiotics were observed in sediments with concentrations of ND-6.50 ng/g. Sulfonamides (SAs) were the dominated antibiotics in water in two seasons. SAs and quinolones (QNs) in wet season and macrolides (MLs) and QNs in dry season predominated in sediments. The reservoir and inflow rivers showed significant differences in antibiotic concentrations and compositions in water and sediments. As an important input source of reservoir, the river water showed significantly higher total antibiotic concentrations than those in the reservoir. In contrast, the reservoir sediments are the sink of antibiotics, and had higher total antibiotic concentrations compared with rivers. A prioritization approach based on the overall risk scores and detection frequencies of antibiotics was developed, and 3 (sulfaguanidine, anhydroerythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole) and 5 (doxycycline, sulfadiazine, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and flumequine) antibiotics with high and moderate priority, respectively, were screened. The study provides a comprehensive insight of antibiotics in the Miyun Reservoir and its inflow rivers, and is significant for future monitoring and pollution mitigation of antibiotics.

Indexed as

QuinolonesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBeijingChinaEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRiversWaterAnti-Bacterial AgentsQuinolonesWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAntibioticsComparisonPrioritizationReservoir, Inflow rivers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.