Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837598›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2022

What Support Systems do Women Caring for Preterm Infants at Home Require in Urban Ghana? A Qualitative Study.

Panzin Emmanuel Tibil, John Kuumuori Ganle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Panzin Emmanuel TibilMidwifery Training College, P.O. Box 255, Bolgatanga, Ghana.
John Kuumuori GanleDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, P.O. Box LG 13, Accra, Ghana. jganle@ug.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8382-3437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaring for preterm infants and ensuring their survival beyond neonatal intensive care units remain a challenge in many low-income settings. While studies highlight the difficulties of caring for preterm infants at home, few have focused on the forms, sources, and accessibility to support systems. This study explored the forms of support systems women caring for preterm infants at home in urban Ghana require, and their accessibility to such support systems.

methodsAn explorative cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted. A total of 19 women who were caring for preterm infants aged 2-6 months at home were purposively sampled. In-depth interviews were conducted and thematic content analysis used to analyse the data.

resultsWomen reported four main forms of support which they require: psychosocial support, practical support, material support and spiritual support. However, accessibility to these support systems was highly unequal, often depended on one's social status and the quality of one's family and interpersonal relationships prior to giving birth to a preterm infant.

conclusionWomen caring for preterm infants at home require a variety of support systems; but effective accessibility remains a challenge for many in urban settings. Interventions to strengthen community and home-based support for women caring for preterm infants at home, including use of social media-based peer support groups, are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureMothersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPregnancyAccessibilityGhanaNewborn healthPreterm birth, preterm infantSupport system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.