Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022
Phase I/II clinical trial of high-dose [
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radioligand therapy for pediatric patients with solid tumors.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of an endoplasmic reticulum stress related model to predict prognosis and tumor microenvironment in neuroblastoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical applications and future directions of Iodine-131-Metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy in neuroblastoma: from salvage treatment to frontline integration.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Recent advances in theranostics and oncology PET: emerging radionuclides and targets.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Effective Treatment of SSTR2-Positive Small Cell Lung Cancer UsingMolecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePaediatric high-risk neuroblastoma has poor prognosis despite modern multimodality therapy. This phase I/II study aimed to determine the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and efficacy of high-dose
methodsPatients received 666 MBq/kg of
resultsWe enrolled eight patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (six females; six newly diagnosed and two relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma; median age, 4 years; range, 1-10 years). Although all patients had adverse events/reactions after high-dose
conclusionTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs041180030. NAME OF REGISTRY: Feasibility of high-dose iodine-131-meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma preceding myeloablative chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (High-dose iodine-131-meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma). URL OF REGISTRY: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041180030 . DATE OF ENROLMENT OF THE FIRST PARTICIPANT TO THE TRIAL: 12/01/2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.