Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837506›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study.

Artur Stolarczyk, Magda Stolarczyk, Łukasz Oleksy, Grzegorz J Maciąg, Piotr Stępiński, Jakub Szymczak, Maciej Świercz, Krystian Żarnovsky, Marcin Mostowy, Bartosz M Maciąg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Artur StolarczykDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Magda Stolarczyk3rd Clinic of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz OleksyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz J MaciągDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr StępińskiDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub SzymczakDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej ŚwierczDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Krystian ŻarnovskyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin MostowyMedical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Bartosz M MaciągDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. bmaciag@wum.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0311-3735
Medical University of Warsaw · PLMedical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTotal hip replacement (THR) is considered one of the most effective medical procedures in treatment of osteoarthritis. Since its introduction, there has been a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. Following study was designed to assess the importance of femoral head size in long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cohort of 30 patients with primary end stage osteoarthritis who underwent total hip replacement was analysed retrospectively. A homogenous group was chosen with no major differences in BMI. Patients' gait parameters were measured in a biomechanics laboratory using the 3D BTS Smart system. WOMAC and VAS questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcome.

resultsThe subgroup with larger implant head size had several outcomes significantly superior to the subgroup with standard head size and non-inferior to healthy hips. Following variables were measured during this study: time of support phase, time of swing phase, double support time, walking hip extension angle.

conclusionsUse of larger sized femoral heads during THR gives better results in terms of gait pattern. Since restoring the gait pattern is one of the aspects of rehabilitation and returning to daily activities it seems to be an important observation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipOsteoarthritisCohort StudiesFemur HeadGaitHip JointHumansRetrospective StudiesArthroplastyBiomechanicsGaitLarge headPatternTotal hip replacement

Identifiers

PMID34837506
PMCPMC9596593
OpenAlexW3215113854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.