Trial reportClinical drug investigation2022
Bioequivalence Study of Palbociclib Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of indobufen tablets under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Bioequivalence Study of Palbociclib Tablets in Healthy Volunteers.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Bioequivalence of a single dose of two palbociclib formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions: a two-period crossover study with rabeprazole pre-treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Palbociclib Capsule: A Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions to Compare Two Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePalbociclib is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 used for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between a new generic and a branded reference formulation of palbociclib capsules in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions and evaluated the bioequivalence of two palbociclib products to obtain sufficient evidence for the marketing approval of the new generic drug.
methodsA randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions (30 subjects/condition). Eligible healthy subjects received a single 125-mg dose of the palbociclib test or reference formulation followed by a 14-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected at scheduled timepoints, and plasma concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. A non-compartment method was used to calculate the main pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC
resultsUnder the fasting condition, the pharmacokinetic parameter values of the test formulation were similar to those of the reference formulation. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 94.35-103.82% for C
conclusionsPharmacokinetic bioequivalence of palbociclib in healthy subjects was established between the palbociclib test formulation and the reference formulation under fasting and fed conditions according to predetermined regulatory criteria. The two formulations were safe and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.