Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837144›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Comparison of 4-factor PCC reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for intracranial hemorrhage.

Stacy Pasciolla, Kevin Wojcik, Tapan Kavi, Danielle Green, Hamza Shaikh, Brian Jankowitz, Lauren A Igneri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Retrospective Analysis of the Real-World Utilization of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Plasma in Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Bleeding in US Hospitals.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stacy PasciollaPhiladelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA. spasciolla@usciences.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-7347
Kevin WojcikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.
Tapan KaviNeurocritical Care, OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Danielle GreenDepartment of Pharmacy, Doylestown Health, Doylestown, PA, USA.
Hamza ShaikhDirector of Neurointerventional Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.
Brian JankowitzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn Neuroscience Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lauren A IgneriDepartment of Pharmacy, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-505X
Cooper University Health Care · USDoylestown Hospital · USOhioHealth · USPenn Center for AIDS Research · USUniversity of the Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) for direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) as compared to its use in warfarin-associated ICH. A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the efficacy of 4F-PCC for reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for ICH at Cooper University Health Care from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients included were ≥ 18 years of age who developed an ICH while on apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. The primary outcome was to compare the percentage of patients with Excellent or Good hemostatic efficacy after 4F-PCC administration. Secondary outcomes were to describe functional outcomes at discharge, in-hospital mortality, and thrombotic complications after 4F-PCC administration. A total of 159 patients were included; 115 patients received warfarin and 44 patients received a DOAC (apixaban, n = 22; rivaroxaban, n = 22). 70 patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Thirty-four (66.7%) patients in the warfarin group versus 14 (73.7%) patients in the DOAC group were determined to have excellent or good hemostatic efficacy (p = 0.57). In-hospital mortality (30.4% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.21) and thrombotic complications (9.6% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.67) were comparable between the warfarin vs. DOAC groups, respectively. This small, retrospective study found no difference in patients with excellent/good hemostatic efficacy after reversal with 4F-PCC for DOAC-associated ICH compared to warfarin-associated ICH. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and sample size. Larger, prospective studies are needed to further determine the efficacy of 4F-PCC in reversing DOAC-associated ICH.

Indexed as

HemostaticsWarfarinAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor IXHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesPyrazolesPyridonesRetrospective StudiesRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsapixabanBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor IXHemostaticsPyrazolesPyridonesRivaroxabanWarfarinApixabanIntracranial hemorrhagesRivaroxabanWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID34837144
OpenAlexW3216449487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.