Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837134›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Young Women with Breast Cancer: Chemotherapy or Surgery First? An Evaluation of Time to Treatment for Invasive Breast Cancer.

Evelyne Guay, Erin Cordeiro, Amanda Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evelyne GuaySchool of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2642-1439
Erin Cordeiro *Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Amanda Roberts *Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. amanda.roberts@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer in young women (ages 18-40 years) is rare, yet remains a leading cause of cancer-related death. Time to treatment (TTT) is an increasingly important factor in breast cancer outcomes, specifically time to systemic therapy. Our objective was to review patterns of care for young women presenting with invasive breast cancer and compare TTT for surgery first versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective chart review of young women with non-metastatic, non-inflammatory invasive breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 at a single institution was completed. The primary outcome was time to first treatment (surgery or NAC).

resultsOne hundred forty-two young women were treated for invasive breast cancer during the study period. The majority of patients underwent surgery first (57.7%) compared with NAC (42.3%). Women who underwent NAC were more likely to have abnormal lymph nodes on imaging (p = 0.002) and clinical exam (p < 0.0001) and were also more likely to have larger tumor sizes (p < 0.05). The majority of triple negative patients underwent NAC first (88% [14/16]). Median TTT was significantly longer for surgery (27 [range 7-70] days) versus (20.5 [3-50] days) chemotherapy (p = 0.004). Median number of additional hospital visits prior to surgery was 4 (range 1-8) versus 5 (0-11) for NAC (p < 0.001).

conclusionsYoung women with breast cancer who undergo NAC have a shorter TTT and clinically similar median number of hospital visits compared with women undergoing surgery first. These results support the use of NAC in young women, when indicated, as additional workup and consultations prior to NAC do not delay care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTime-to-TreatmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34837134
PMCPMC8625669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.