ArticleScientific reports2021
A register-based study comparing planned rehabilitation following acute stroke in 2011 and 2017.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Absolute risk of acquired brain injury and rehabilitation needs in Denmark, 2014-2023: a population-based prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Early Pupil Abnormality Frequency Predicts Poor Outcomes and Enhances International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Model Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury.Critical care explorations · 2025Observational
- Regional variation in access to and quality of acute stroke care: results of Germany's Health System Performance Assessment pilot, 2014-2020.Research in health services & regions · 2024Article
- Predictors for Upper-Limb Functional Recovery Trajectory in Individuals Receiving Stroke Rehabilitation: A Secondary Analysis of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional, register-based study aimed to explore patterns of planned rehabilitation at discharge from stroke units in Sweden in 2011 and 2017 and identify explanatory variables for planned rehabilitation. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to identify variables that could explain planned rehabilitation. There were 19,158 patients in 2011 and 16,508 patients in 2017 with stroke, included in the study. In 2011, 57% of patients were planned for some form of rehabilitation at discharge from stroke unit, which increased to 72% in 2017 (p < 0.001). Patients with impaired consciousness at admission had increased odds for planned rehabilitation (hemorrhage 2011 OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.81, 2017 OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.20-2.32), (IS 2011 OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.34, 2017 OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.28-1.75). Admission to a community hospital (hemorrhage 2011 OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.74, 2017 OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.56) (IS 2011 OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.58-0.69, 2017 OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.61) or to a specialized non-university hospital (hemorrhage 2017 OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94), (IS 2011 OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98, 2017 OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.84) was associated with decreased odds of receiving planned rehabilitation compared to admission to a university hospital. As a conclusion severe stroke was associated with increased odds for planned rehabilitation and patients discharged from non-university hospitals had consistently decreased odds for planned rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.