Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836972›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2021

Effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor enhancing agents on cognition in dementia: an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chun-Hung Chang, Chieh-Yu Liu, Shaw-Ji Chen, Hsin-Chi Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Intermittent supplementation withFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chun-Hung ChangInstitute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Chieh-Yu LiuBiostatistics Consultant Lab, Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Shaw-Ji ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Taitung MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taitung, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsin-Chi TsaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Tzu-Chi General Hospital, Hualien City, Taiwan, ROC. d21868@mail.tmanh.org.tw.
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TWMackay Medical University · TWNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor enhancing agents have had promising effects on cognition among patients with dementia. However, the results remain inconsistent. This exploratory meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of NMDA receptor enhancing agents for cognitive function. PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Controlled trials assessing add-on NMDA receptor enhancing agent treatment in patients with dementia and using cognition rating scales were eligible and pooled using a random-effect model for comparisons. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated in each study from the effect size; positive values indicated that NMDA receptor enhancing agent treatment improved cognitive function. Funnel plots and the I2 statistic were evaluated for statistical heterogeneity. Moderators were evaluated using meta-regression. We identified 14 RCTs with 2224 participants meeting the inclusion criteria. Add-on NMDA receptor enhancing agents had small positive significant effects on overall cognitive function among patients with dementia (SMD = 0.1002, 95% CI 0.0105-0.1900, P = 0.02860). Subgroup meta-analysis showed patients with Alzheimer's Disease and trials using the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale as the primary outcome had small positive significant effects (SMD = 0.1042, 95% CI 0.0076-0.2007, P = 0.03451; SMD = 0.1267, 95% CI 0.0145-0.2388, P = 0.2686). This exploratory meta-analysis showed a very small, positive, and significant effect on overall cognition function in patients with dementia. Studies with larger samples are needed to evaluate different cognitive domains and phases of dementia.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersDementiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID34836972
PMCPMC8626464
OpenAlexW3217346758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.