Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836954›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Mammary tumour cells remodel the bone marrow vascular microenvironment to support metastasis.

Raymond K H Yip, Joel S Rimes, Bianca D Capaldo, François Vaillant, Kellie A Mouchemore, Bhupinder Pal, Yunshun Chen, Elliot Surgenor, Andrew J Murphy, Robin L Anderson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating the Efficacy of Polyphenol-Enriched Plant Extracts and Pathway Modulators in the Bone Marrow to Suppress Breast Cancer Progression.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Interaction between diabetes and osteoporosis: imbalance between inflammation and bone remodeling.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond K H YipACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-7686
Joel S Rimes *Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-2784
Bianca D Capaldo *ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
François VaillantACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-3760
Kellie A MouchemoreSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Bhupinder PalACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-4331
Yunshun ChenDepartment of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-5653
Elliot SurgenorACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Andrew J MurphyDepartment of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7039-7777
Robin L AndersonSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Gordon K SmythBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-2892
Geoffrey J LindemanACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-2416
Edwin D Hawkins *Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. hawkins.e@wehi.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3686-8261
Jane E Visvader *ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. visvader@wehi.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-6977
The University of Melbourne · AULa Trobe University · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow is a preferred metastatic site for multiple solid tumours and is associated with poor prognosis and significant morbidity. Accumulating evidence indicates that cancer cells colonise specialised niches within the bone marrow to support their long-term propagation, but the precise location and mechanisms that mediate niche interactions are unknown. Using breast cancer as a model of solid tumour metastasis to the bone marrow, we applied large-scale quantitative three-dimensional imaging to characterise temporal changes in the bone marrow microenvironment during disease progression. We show that mouse mammary tumour cells preferentially home to a pre-existing metaphyseal domain enriched for type H vessels. Metastatic lesion outgrowth rapidly remodelled the local vasculature through extensive sprouting to establish a tumour-supportive microenvironment. The evolution of this tumour microenvironment reflects direct remodelling of the vascular endothelium through tumour-derived granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a hematopoietic cell-independent manner. Therapeutic targeting of the metastatic niche by blocking G-CSF receptor inhibited pathological blood vessel remodelling and reduced bone metastasis burden. These findings elucidate a mechanism of 'host' microenvironment hijacking by mammary tumour cells to subvert the local microvasculature to form a specialised, pro-tumorigenic niche.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsMammary Neoplasms, AnimalNeoplasm MetastasisTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBone and BonesDisease ProgressionGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceNeoplasms, Second PrimaryReceptors, Colony-Stimulating FactorCSF3R protein, humanGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID34836954
PMCPMC8626461
OpenAlexW3215583707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.