ArticleBMJ global health2021
Gender-related data missingness, imbalance and bias in global health surveys.
Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and disparities in preventive oral health care in the UK: insights from oral health professionals and consumers surveys.BDJ open · 2026Article
- Urological care for sexual and gender minorities: a narrative review toward equitable care.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Short-Term Safety and Adverse Event Risk Profiles for SARS-CoV-2 Booster Vaccine Doses in Australian Adults: A Survey Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Current Scenario of Pharmaceutical Waste Management in Chattogram District, Southern Bangladesh: A Comprehensive Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Preferences for Personalized Text Message Appointment Reminders Among Outpatients in a Universal Health System: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Being a Swedish university student in a country far away: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Analyzing human gut microbiome data from global populations: challenges and resources.Trends in microbiology · 2025Review
- Women's participation in mobile phone surveys in Mozambique: Findings from a qualitative study.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Article
- Lack of Gender-Disaggregated Data for the Psychological Impact of ACL Injury on Adolescents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gender bias in health financing methods: metrics and data.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Paediatric healthcare in Manhiça district through a gender lens: a retrospective analysis of 17 years of morbidity and demographic surveillance data.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Worldwide trends and future projections of fungal skin disease burden: a comprehensive analysis from the Global Burden of Diseases study 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Developing a Gender Framework for Responsive and Adaptive Design in Digital Health (FORWARD) from a review of reviews.BMC digital health · 2025Article
- How does a recent gender norms scale perform? Exploratory factor analyses among adolescents in Ethiopia and Bangladesh.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Personalized Care in the UAE : A Study on Precision Medicine Awareness and Accessibility among the general population.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Biases in Artificial Intelligence Application in Pain Medicine.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Global trends in refractive disorders from 1990 to 2021: insights from the global burden of disease study and predictive modeling.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Gender scores in epidemiological research: methods, advantages and implications.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global surveys have built-in gender-related biases associated with data missingness across the gender dimensions of people's lives, imbalanced or incomplete representation of population groups, and biased ways in which gender information is elicited and used. While increasing focus is being placed on the integration of sex-disaggregated statistics into national programmes and on understanding effects of gender-based disparities on the health of all people, the data necessary for elucidating underlying causes of gender disparities and designing effective intervention programmes continue to be lacking. Approaches exist, however, that can reasonably address some shortcomings, such as separating questions of gender identification from biological sex. Qualitative research can elucidate ways to rephrase questions and translate gendered terms to avoid perpetuating historical gender biases and prompting biased responses. Non-health disciplines may offer lessons in collecting gender-related data. Ultimately, multidisciplinary global collaborations are needed to advance this evolving field and to set standards for how we measure gender in all its forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.