ReviewNutrients2021
Recommendations for Integrating Evidence-Based, Sustainable Diet Information into Nutrition Education.
Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of education provided to university students on sustainable nutrition: a comparison of ChatGPT and individual nutrition education.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Transtheoretical Model-Based Sustainable Nutrition Behavior Scale (TTM-SNBS) for Adolescents.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Construction and effectiveness assessment of the health education system for outpatient chronic respiratory diseases based on visualized intelligent healthcare.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Food Banks as a "Treasure Trove": Users' Experiences of a Western Australian Food Relief Organization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Nutritional, environmental and economic impacts of ultra-processed food consumption in Australia.Public health nutrition · 2023Article
- Exploring Benefits and Barriers of Plant-Based Diets: Health, Environmental Impact, Food Accessibility and Acceptability.Nutrients · 2023Review
- The Role of Agricultural Systems in Teaching Kitchens: An Integrative Review and Thoughts for the Future.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Plant-Based Innovations for the Transition to Sustainability: A Bibliometric and in-Depth Content Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Perspective: Soy-based Meat and Dairy Alternatives, Despite Classification as Ultra-processed Foods, Deliver High-quality Nutrition on Par with Unprocessed or Minimally Processed Animal-based Counterparts.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of more sustainable diets (SD) has the capacity to meet the needs of individuals without compromising future generations' abilities to do the same. Nutrition educators are ideal candidates for delivering SD education to consumers, yet evidence-based recommendations for the profession have not been crafted. The results of a thorough, narrative review of the literature performed in 2021 suggest there are five well-supported recommendations nutrition educators should consider incorporating in their work. They are (1) shift towards a plant-based diet, (2) mitigate food waste, (3) limit consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF), (4) engage in local food systems, and (5) choose sustainable seafood. Each recommendation is discussed below in detail, to provide nutrition educators with a nuanced scope of the issue, after which suggestions for the inclusion of these recommendations, using an example of the authors' experiences from the US Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP), are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.