Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836386›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Clinical Presentation of Celiac Disease and Diagnosis Accuracy in a Single-Center European Pediatric Cohort over 10 Years.

Anna Rita Di Biase, Giovanni Marasco, Federico Ravaioli, Luigi Colecchia, Elton Dajti, Marco Lecis, Erica Passini, Luigina Vanessa Alemanni, Davide Festi, Lorenzo Iughetti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Rita Di BiasePediatric Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Giovanni MarascoDepartment of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7167-8773
Federico RavaioliDepartment of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1142-8585
Luigi ColecchiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Elton DajtiDepartment of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Marco LecisPediatric Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Erica PassiniPediatric Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Luigina Vanessa AlemanniDepartment of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Davide FestiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo IughettiPediatric Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-7872
Antonio ColecchiaGastroenterology Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Changes in the clinical presentation of celiac disease (CD) in children have been reported. The guidelines of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) allow esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies to be avoided under specific circumstances. We aimed to assess the clinical picture of pediatric CD patients at diagnosis and to validate ESPGHAN non-biopsy criteria. (2) Methods: Patients with suspected CD or undergoing screening from 2004 to 2014 at the University Hospital in Modena, Italy were enrolled. The accuracy of ESPGHAN non-biopsy criteria and modified versions were assessed. (3) Results: In total, 410 patients were enrolled, of whom 403 were considered for analysis. Of the patients considered, 45 were asymptomatic and diagnosed with CD (11.2%) while 358 patients (88.2%) were symptomatic, of whom 295 were diagnosed with CD. Among symptomatic CD patients, 57 (19.3%) had gastrointestinal symptoms, 98 (33%) had atypical symptoms and 140 (47.4%) had both. No difference was found for the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at different ages. The non-biopsy ESPGHAN criteria yielded an accuracy of 59.4% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%; 173 out of 308 EGD (56.2%) could have been avoided. The modified 7× and 5× upper limit of normal cut-offs for IgA anti tissue-transglutaminase reached 60.7% and 64.3% of EGD avoided, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Over 10 years, late age at diagnosis and increased rates of atypical CD presentation were found. ESPGHAN non-biopsy criteria are accurate for CD diagnosis and allow half of unneeded EGD to be avoided. Modified versions allowed sparing a greater number of EGD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAutoantibodiesBiopsyCeliac DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleGastroenterologyHematologic TestsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornItalyMalePredictive Value of Testsanti-transglutaminase autoantibodyAutoantibodiesceliac diseaseesophagogastroduodenoscopyESPGHANpediatric agetransglutaminase

Identifiers

PMID34836386
PMCPMC8625284
OpenAlexW3212803290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.