Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836385›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

A Comparison of Diet Quality in a Sample of Rural and Urban Australian Adults.

Rebekah Pullen, Katherine Kent, Matthew J Sharman, Tracy L Schumacher, Leanne J Brown

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebekah PullenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-9195
Katherine KentSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5330-7044
Matthew J SharmanSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.
Tracy L SchumacherDepartment of Rural Health, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-6036
Leanne J BrownDepartment of Rural Health, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4340-2320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diet quality of rural Australians is under researched. Characterising disparities in diet quality between rural and urban populations may inform targeted interventions in at- risk groups. A cross-sectional study aimed to determine the relationship between diet quality, rurality and sociodemographic characteristics in a sample of Australian adults. Participants were recruited at rural and regional events between 2017 and 2020, in New South Wales, Australia. Diet quality was measured using the Healthy Eating Quiz or Australian Eating Survey to generate an Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was compared by rurality and sociodemographic characteristics using multivariate regression. Participants (

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesRegression AnalysisResidence CharacteristicsRural PopulationUrban PopulationAustralian dietary guidelinesAustralian recommended food scorediet qualitydiet varietyrural

Identifiers

PMID34836385
PMCPMC8624345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.