Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836339›Full record

Observational studyNutrients2021

Comparison of Preoperative Nutritional Indexes for Outcomes after Primary Esophageal Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Jung-Pil Yoon, Jae-Sik Nam, Mohd Fitry Bin Zainal Abidin, Seon-Ok Kim, Eun-Ho Lee, In-Cheol Choi, Ji-Hyun Chin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jung-Pil YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5928-8999
Jae-Sik NamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9378-2720
Mohd Fitry Bin Zainal AbidinDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Malaya Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya 59100, Malaysia.
Seon-Ok KimAsan Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9010-5460
Eun-Ho LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6369-7429
In-Cheol ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Ji-Hyun ChinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9312-1685
Ulsan College · KRUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for predicting postoperative outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 1265 consecutive patients who underwent elective esophageal surgery. The patients were classified into no risk, low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups based on nutritional scores.

resultsThe moderate-risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.92,

conclusionsMalnutrition, evaluated by any of three nutritional indexes, was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative survival.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAgedEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative PeriodPrognosiscontrolling nutritional status scoreesophageal cancergeriatric nutritional risk indexprognostic nutritional indexsurvival

Identifiers

PMID34836339
PMCPMC8619324
OpenAlexW3212115281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.