Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836154›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery.

Camilla Fiorindi, Gabriele Dragoni, Stefano Scaringi, Fabio Staderini, Anita Nannoni, Ferdinando Ficari, Francesco Giudici

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. British Dietetic Association consensus guidelines on the nutritional assessment and dietary management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla FiorindiDepartment of Health Science, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1387-0446
Gabriele DragoniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-5113
Stefano ScaringiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-8318
Fabio StaderiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-2563
Anita NannoniDepartment of Health Science, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Ferdinando FicariDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Francesco GiudiciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-5685
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of malnutrition and preoperative nutritional care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgery is mandatory. There is no validated nutritional screening tool for IBD patients. We developed a novel nutritional screening tool for IBD patients requiring surgery and compared it with other tools.

methodswe included 62 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery. The IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD) was developed to screen patients for further comprehensive assessment. NRS-2002, MUST, MST, MIRT, SaskIBD-NR are compared with the new test. All screening tests were subsequently related to new GLIM criteria.

resultsaccording to GLIM criteria, 25 (40%) IBD patients were malnourished (15 CD and 10 UC, 33% vs. 63%,

conclusionsin IBD, currently adopted nutritional screening tools are characterized by a low sensitivity when malnutrition diagnosis is performed with recent GLIM criteria. Our proposed tool to detect malnutrition performed the best in detecting patients that may require nutritional assessment and preoperative intervention.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPreoperative CareReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsGLIMIBDmalnutritionnutritional screening toolsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34836154
PMCPMC8623109
OpenAlexW3208917099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.