Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835947›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Adherence to the Planetary Health Diet Index and Obesity Indicators in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

Leandro Teixeira Cacau, Isabela Martins Benseñor, Alessandra Carvalho Goulart, Leticia Oliveira Cardoso, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Luis A Moreno, Dirce Maria Marchioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leandro Teixeira CacauDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1681-5960
Isabela Martins BenseñorClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6723-5678
Alessandra Carvalho GoulartClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Leticia Oliveira CardosoNational School of Public Health, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21041-210, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6810-5779
Paulo Andrade LotufoClinical and Epidemiological Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Luis A MorenoGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-653X
Dirce Maria MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil.

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2020/12326-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EAT-Lancet Commission has proposed a model diet to improve the health of human beings and that of the planet. Recently, we proposed the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) to assess adherence of the population to this model diet. In this study, we aimed to evaluate adherence to the PHDI and obesity outcomes using baseline data from 14,515 participants in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). The dietary data were assessed using a 114-item FFQ. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were both used continuously and categorized. Linear and multinomial regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors were performed to assess the relationship between adherence to PHDI and outcomes. An inverse association was observed between adherence to PHDI and obesity indicators. Individuals with high adherence to the PHDI had lower BMI (β-0.50 95% CI-0.73:-0.27) and WC (β-1.70 95% CI-2.28:-1.12) values. They were also 24% less likely to be overweight (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.67:0.85) or obese (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.65:0.88), and they were 14% and 27% less likely to have increased WC (OR 0.86 95% CI 0.75:0.98) or substantially increased WC (OR 0.73 95% CI 0.64:0.83) than those with lower adherence. Our results showed that higher adherence to the PHDI may decrease obesity indicators.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyDiet SurveysFemaleGlobal HealthGuideline AdherenceHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Ageddiet qualityEAT-Lancet dietobesitysustainable diet

Identifiers

PMID34835947
PMCPMC8625681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.