ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Force Dependence of Proteins' Transition State Position and the Bell-Evans Model.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temperature-dependent funnel-like DNA folding landscapes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- On the distance to the transition state of protein folding in optical tweezers experiments.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Single-Molecule-Level Quantification Based on Atomic Force Microscopy Data Reveals the Interaction between Melittin and Lipopolysaccharide in Gram-Negative Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Protein Nanomechanics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Molten globule-like transition state of protein barnase measured with calorimetric force spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-molecule force spectroscopy has opened a new field of research in molecular biophysics and biochemistry. Pulling experiments on individual proteins permit us to monitor conformational transitions with high temporal resolution and measure their free energy landscape. The force-extension curves of single proteins often present large hysteresis, with unfolding forces that are higher than refolding ones. Therefore, the high energy of the transition state (TS) in these molecules precludes kinetic rates measurements in equilibrium hopping experiments. In irreversible pulling experiments, force-dependent kinetic rates measurements show a systematic discrepancy between the sum of the folding and unfolding TS distances derived by the kinetic Bell-Evans model and the full molecular extension predicted by elastic models. Here, we show that this discrepancy originates from the force-induced movement of TS. Specifically, we investigate the highly kinetically stable protein barnase, using pulling experiments and the Bell-Evans model to characterize the position of its kinetic barrier. Experimental results show that while the TS stays at a roughly constant distance relative to the native state, it shifts with force relative to the unfolded state. Interestingly, a conversion of the protein extension into amino acid units shows that the TS position follows the Leffler-Hammond postulate: the higher the force, the lower the number of unzipped amino acids relative to the native state. The results are compared with the quasi-reversible unfolding-folding of a short DNA hairpin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.