Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835560›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Interpretation of Single-Molecule Force Experiments on Proteins Using Normal Mode Analysis.

Jacob Bauer, Gabriel Žoldák

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Protein Nanomechanics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob BauerInstitute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 21, 845 51 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-1340
Gabriel ŽoldákCenter for Interdisciplinary Biosciences, P. J. Šafárik University, Technology and Innovation Park, Trieda SNP 1, 041 54 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-8837

Funding

EU H2020 TWINNING program GA. No. 952333 project CasProtInterreg SK-AT StruBioMol ITMS: 305011x666Operational Programme Integrated Infrastructure, funded by the ERDF ITMS2014+: 313011AUW6Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-18-0285Vedecká grantová agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV (VEGA) VEGA 1/0175/19Vedecká grantová agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV (VEGA) VEGA 2/0131/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments allow protein folding and unfolding to be explored using mechanical force. Probably the most informative technique for interpreting the results of these experiments at the structural level makes use of steered molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, which can explicitly model the protein under load. Unfortunately, this technique is computationally expensive for many of the most interesting biological molecules. Here, we find that normal mode analysis (NMA), a significantly cheaper technique from a computational perspective, allows at least some of the insights provided by MD simulation to be gathered. We apply this technique to three non-homologous proteins that were previously studied by force spectroscopy: T4 lysozyme (T4L), Hsp70 and the glucocorticoid receptor domain (GCR). The NMA results for T4L and Hsp70 are compared with steered MD simulations conducted previously, and we find that we can recover the main results. For the GCR, which did not undergo MD simulation, our approach identifies substructures that correlate with experimentally identified unfolding intermediates. Overall, we find that NMA can make a valuable addition to the analysis toolkit for the structural analysis of single-molecule force experiments on proteins.

Indexed as

computational chemistrynormal mode analysissingle-molecule force spectroscopysingle-molecule optical trap experiments

Identifiers

PMID34835560
PMCPMC8624234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.