Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835471›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2021

Identification of Oocyst-Driven

Gema Álvarez García, Rebecca Davidson, Pikka Jokelainen, Siv Klevar, Furio Spano, Frank Seeber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Isolation, genotyping and phenotypingFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances towards the completeFaculty reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Limited value of current and newFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
  12. Mining the Proteome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gema Álvarez GarcíaSaluvet Group, Animal Health Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Rebecca DavidsonDepartment of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, 9016 Tromsø, Norway.
Pikka JokelainenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3035-5094
Siv KlevarDepartment of Analysis and Diagnostics, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, 1433 Ås, Norway.
Furio SpanoUnit of Foodborne and Neglected Parasitic Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Frank SeeberFG 16: Mycotic and Parasitic Agents and Mycobacteria, Robert Koch-Institut, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-3699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The apicomplexan zoonotic parasite

Indexed as

antigen predictionoocyst-specific antigenssource attributionstage-specific serologysurfaceometoxoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID34835471
PMCPMC8618849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.