Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835445›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Development and Evaluation of Alternative Methods to Identify the Three Most Common Serotypes of

Sabyrkhan M Barmak, Yuriy A Sinyavskiy, Aidar B Berdygaliev, Turegeldy Sh Sharmanov, Irina S Savitskaya, Gulmira T Sultankulova, Elena V Zholdybayeva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surveillance ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole-genome sequence and annotation ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sabyrkhan M BarmakFaculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6193-5390
Yuriy A SinyavskiyBiotechnology and Biologically Active Substances Laboratory, Kazakh Academy of Nutrition, Almaty 050008, Kazakhstan.
Aidar B BerdygalievBiotechnology and Biologically Active Substances Laboratory, Kazakh Academy of Nutrition, Almaty 050008, Kazakhstan.
Turegeldy Sh SharmanovBiotechnology and Biologically Active Substances Laboratory, Kazakh Academy of Nutrition, Almaty 050008, Kazakhstan.
Irina S SavitskayaFaculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Gulmira T SultankulovaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050012, Kazakhstan.
Elena V ZholdybayevaNational Center for Biotechnology, National Scientific Shared Laboratory of Biotechnology, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.
T.K. Zhurgenov Kazakh National Academy of Arts · KZAl-Farabi Kazakh National University · KZKazakh National Medical University · KZNational Center for Biotechnology · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of conventional PCR and real-time PCR assays as screening methods for identification of three frequent, clinically significant Salmonella serovars in Kazakhstan. We determined the diagnostic efficacy of three molecular methods for detection of

Indexed as

PCRRAPD-PCRreal-time PCRSalmonella entericaS. EnteritidisS. TyphimuriumS. Virchow

Identifiers

PMID34835445
PMCPMC8625340
OpenAlexW3214482136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.