ArticleMicroorganisms2021
Insights into the Oral Bacterial Microbiota of Sows.
Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic exposure during weaning disrupts oral microbiota assembly in piglets.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- One Health Investigation of Stage-Dependent Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns Across Intermediate and Ripened Dairy Matrices: The Tyrovolia-Kopanisti Paradigm.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Exploring the potential of salivary small RNAs as non-invasive biomarkers in pigs.Journal of animal science and technology · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Diversity and Composition in Oral Fluid from Pigs of Different Ages and Water Pipe Wall Biofilms.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Bacterial profiles of the oral, vaginal, and rectal mucosa and colostrum of periparturient sows.PloS one · 2025Article
- Safe and efficient transportation of clinical samples for molecular detection of African swine fever virus.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The investigation of bacterial microbiota represents a developing research field in veterinary medicine intended to look for correlations between animal health and the balance within bacterial populations. The aim of the present work was to define the bacterial microbiota of the oral cavity of healthy sows, which had not been thoroughly described so far. In total, 22 samples of oral fluid were collected and analyzed by 16S-rRNA gene sequencing. CLC Genomics Workbench 20.0 (QIAGEN Digital Insights, Aarhus, Denmark) was then used to examine the results. The predominant orders were Lactobacillales, Clostridiales, and Corynebacteriales. Lactobacillaceae, Corynebacteriaceae, Moraxellaceae, Aerococcaceae, and Staphylococcaceae were the most represented families. As regards the most abundant genera,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.