Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835303›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Patients' Perception and Knowledge about Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey in Patients at Risk of Infections.

Paul Loubet, Jalini Rouvière, Adeline Merceron, Odile Launay, Albert Sotto, On Behalf Of The Avnir Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243236 ("Assessment of the Impact of Vaccine Funding by the National Health Insurance on Vaccination Coverage Among Patients Targeted by Current Vaccination Recommendations and Followed in Outpatient Consultations in Ile-de-France Region in France""), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243236 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

"Assessment of the Impact of Vaccine Funding by the National Health Insurance on Vaccination Coverage Among Patients Targeted by Current Vaccination Recommendations and Followed in Outpatient Consultations in Ile-de-France Region in France""

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2025 to 2027Enrolled2,920ConditionsHealthcare Providers, PostpartumArmsQuestionnaires for patients, Questionnaires for healthcare providers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul LoubetINSERM U1047, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, CHU Nîmes, Université Montpellier, 30900 Nîmes, France.
Jalini RouvièrePfizer, 75668 Paris, France.
Adeline MerceronIPSOS, 75013 Paris, France.
Odile LaunayFaculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, Université de Paris, AP-PH, Inserm, CIC Cochin Pasteur, 75231 Paris, France.
Albert SottoINSERM U1047, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, CHU Nîmes, Université Montpellier, 30900 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-9386
On Behalf Of The Avnir Group
Inserm · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRIpsos (United States) · USPfizer (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of our study was to assess, in an at-risk population, perception and knowledge about influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.

methodsAn anonymous web-based survey was submitted to patients recruited in France, from both an Ipsos internal panel and AVNIR patient associations. The study was conducted between July and October 2020, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsOverall, 2177 questionnaires from patients at risk of infection were analyzed. Almost all respondents (86%, 1869/2177) declared themselves to be favorable to vaccination. Nearly half of the patients (49%, 1069/2177) were aware of which vaccine was recommended for their specific situation. This percentage was significantly (

conclusionOur study highlighted the nonoptimal vaccine coverage in at-risk populations despite a highly positive perception of vaccines and confirmed that physicians are on the front lines to suggest and recommend these vaccinations, especially in the current pandemic context, which may be used to promote other vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinesimmunizationimmunocompromisedpneumococcal vaccinesseasonal influenza vaccinesvaccinationvaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID34835303
PMCPMC8623007
OpenAlexW3216772962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.