Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835246›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Optimizing a Protocol to Assess Immune Responses after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney-Transplanted Patients: In Vivo DTH Cutaneous Test as the Initial Screening Method.

Yvelise Barrios, Aurelio Rodriguez, Andrés Franco, Cristina Alava-Cruz, Domingo Marrero-Miranda, Lourdes Perez-Tamajon, Victor Matheu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvelise BarriosDepartment of Immunology, Main Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6994-2034
Aurelio RodriguezDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Andrés FrancoDepartment of Immunology, Main Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Cristina Alava-CruzDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Domingo Marrero-MirandaDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Lourdes Perez-TamajonDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Victor MatheuDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-800X
Hospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

Fundacion SEAIC SEAIC 2021 Beca20A4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, the delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) cutaneous test with the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to be a simple in vivo method to measure T-cell functionality after natural infection and in vaccinated individuals.

methodsTwenty-five kidney-transplanted recipients were immunized with two doses of the mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech COVID19 vaccine three weeks apart. Cell-immune response (CIR) was evaluated ten weeks later using an in vivo DTH skin test and in vitro with an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA). Humoral Immune Response (HIR) was determined by the measurement of specific IgG anti-S1 SARS-CoV-2.

resultsTen weeks after the second dose of the vaccine, 23 out of 25 transplanted patients had a positive DTH skin test, while in vitro CIR was considered positive in 20 patients. Unspecific stimulation was positive in all 25 patients, showing no T-cell defect. Seven out of twenty-five patients had a negative specific anti-spike IgG. CIR was positive in all immune-competent control patients.

conclusionsDTH is a useful, simple, and cheaper tool that can be used to assess cellular immune response, with an excellent correlation with the in vitro CIR. CIR assessment after vaccination in these immunocompromised patients is an excellent complement to HIR-based methods. This skin test could be used if classical in vitro methods cannot be applied.

Indexed as

delayed-type hypersensitivityDTHimmunosuppressionkidney transplantSARS-CoV-2skin testT-cell responsevaccination

Identifiers

PMID34835246
PMCPMC8620584
OpenAlexW3214221211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.