Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835199›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Reactogenicity of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Young Working Age Population: A Survey among Medical School Residents, within a Mass Vaccination Campaign, in a Regional Reference Teaching Hospital in Italy.

Alborz Rahmani, Guglielmo Dini, Andrea Orsi, Laura Sticchi, Bianca Bruzzone, Alfredo Montecucco, Luca Pellegrini, Alessia Manca, Alexander Domnich, Angela Battistini and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alborz RahmaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-046X
Guglielmo DiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0497-4879
Andrea OrsiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2433-9610
Laura SticchiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Bianca BruzzoneHygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alfredo MontecuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Luca PellegriniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alessia MancaOccupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alexander DomnichHygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9608-8892
Angela BattistiniHygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Bruno Kusznir VitturiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Sonia ZacconiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Nicoletta DebarbieriOccupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Giancarlo IcardiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-8487
Paolo DurandoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-5176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinations are a key prevention measure in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (BioNTech/Pfizer), the first to receive authorization, was widely used in the mass vaccination campaign in Italy. Healthcare workers were identified as a priority group for vaccination, but few studies have assessed its reactogenicity among the young working age population. An online survey was conducted to investigate the adverse reactions occurring in the 7 days following the first and second vaccination doses amongst resident doctors of the University of Genoa, employed at the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino of Genoa, between 11 January and 16 March 2021. A total of 512 resident physicians were invited to participate in the study (female = 53.2%; mean age = 28.9 years), of whom 296 (female = 53.4%, mean age = 28.9 years) and 275 (female = 55.3%, mean age = 29.1 years) completed the survey after their first and second vaccination doses, respectively. In the 7 days following the first dose, most common adverse reactions were local pain (96.3%), fatigue (42.6%), headache (33.8%), arthromyalgia (28.0%), and 5.1% reported fever, while following the second dose, participants reported local pain (93.5%), fatigue (74.9%), headache (57.5%), arthromyalgia (58.2%), and fever (30.9%), with a higher prevalence among females. Systemic (but not local) reactions increased following the second vaccination, reaching severe intensity in 9.8% of participants and causing three or more events of moderate intensity in 23.7% of participants. Adverse reactions preventing regular daily activities could cause absenteeism among workers. These results can be useful to inform populations of young individuals, set expectations, and improve adherence to vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

adverse reactionsCOVID-19healthcare workersmass vaccination campaignmRNA vaccineoccupational healthreactogenicity

Identifiers

PMID34835199
PMCPMC8625320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.