Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835050›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

From Mosquito Bites to Sexual Transmission: Evaluating Mouse Models of Zika Virus Infection.

Elizabeth Balint, Amelia Montemarano, Emily Feng, Ali A Ashkar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth BalintMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-7807
Amelia MontemaranoMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Emily FengMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-4749
Ali A AshkarMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
McMaster University Medical Centre · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the recent outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) infections in Latin America, ZIKV has emerged as a global health threat due to its ability to induce neurological disease in both adults and the developing fetus. ZIKV is largely mosquito-borne and is now endemic in many parts of Africa, Asia, and South America. However, several reports have demonstrated persistent ZIKV infection of the male reproductive tract and evidence of male-to-female sexual transmission of ZIKV. Sexual transmission may broaden the reach of ZIKV infections beyond its current geographical limits, presenting a significant threat worldwide. Several mouse models of ZIKV infection have been developed to investigate ZIKV pathogenesis and develop effective vaccines and therapeutics. However, the majority of these models focus on mosquito-borne infection, while few have considered the impact of sexual transmission on immunity and pathogenesis. This review will examine the advantages and disadvantages of current models of mosquito-borne and sexually transmitted ZIKV and provide recommendations for the effective use of ZIKV mouse models.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMicePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralVector Borne DiseasesZika VirusZika Virus Infectionmosquito-borne diseasemouse modelsexually transmitted infectionsZika virus

Identifiers

PMID34835050
PMCPMC8625727
OpenAlexW3212684795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.