Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835033›Full record

ArticleViruses2021

Potential of an Eco-Sustainable Probiotic-Cleaning Formulation in Reducing Infectivity of Enveloped Viruses.

Maria D'Accolti, Irene Soffritti, Francesco Bonfante, Walter Ricciardi, Sante Mazzacane, Elisabetta Caselli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Sdp-SH3b2 domain contained inFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria D'AccoltiSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, LTTA, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1937-5534
Irene SoffrittiSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, LTTA, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-295X
Francesco BonfanteIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, IZSVe, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1276-2710
Walter RicciardiFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5655-688X
Sante MazzacaneCIAS Research Center, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 13, 44122 Ferrara, Italy.
Elisabetta CaselliSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, LTTA, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6048-9141
University of Ferrara · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

POR FESR Emilia Romagna PG/2020/362659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has deeply influenced sanitization procedures, and high-level disinfection has been massively used to prevent SARS-CoV-2 spread, with potential negative impact on the environment and on the threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Aiming to overcome these concerns, yet preserving the effectiveness of sanitization against enveloped viruses, we assessed the antiviral properties of the Probiotic Cleaning Hygiene System (PCHS), an eco-sustainable probiotic-based detergent previously proven to stably abate pathogen contamination and AMR. PCHS (diluted 1:10, 1:50 and 1:100) was tested in comparison to common disinfectants (70% ethanol and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite), in suspension and carrier tests, according with the European UNI EN 14476:2019 and UNI EN 16777:2019 standards. Human alpha- and beta-coronaviruses hCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2, human herpesvirus type 1, human and animal influenza viruses, and vaccinia virus were included in the study. The results showed that PCHS was able to inactivate 99.99% of all tested viruses within 1-2 h of contact, both in suspension and on surface. Notably, while control disinfectants became inactive within 2 h after application, the PCHS antiviral action persisted up to 24 h post-application, suggesting that its use may effectively allow a continuous prevention of virus spread via contaminated environment, without worsening environmental pollution and AMR concern.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus 229E, HumanCOVID-19DisinfectantsDisinfectionEnvironmental MicrobiologyHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansOrthomyxoviridaeProbioticsSanitationSARS-CoV-2Vaccinia virusVirus DiseasesVirusesAntiviral AgentsDisinfectantseco-friendly disinfectionenveloped virus decontaminationinfection controlpreventionSARS-CoV-2 inactivation

Identifiers

PMID34835033
PMCPMC8617880
OpenAlexW3214022643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.