Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835020›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

Structural Biology of Nanobodies against the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2.

Qilong Tang, Raymond J Owens, James H Naismith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Facilitating and restraining virus infection using cell-attachable soluble viral receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Correlation between the binding affinity and the conformational entropy of nanobody SARS-CoV-2 spike protein complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qilong TangStructural Biology, The Rosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0FA, UK.
Raymond J OwensStructural Biology, The Rosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0FA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3705-2993
James H NaismithStructural Biology, The Rosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0FA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6744-5061

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/ S025243/1.Medical Research Council MR/V03958X/1Wellcome Trust 100209/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobodies are 130 amino acid single-domain antibodies (V

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19EpitopesHumansMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationSARS-CoV-2Single-Domain AntibodiesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesSingle-Domain AntibodiesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusantiviral therapyCOVID-19protein complexessingle-chain antibodies

Identifiers

PMID34835020
PMCPMC8625641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.