Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834928›Full record

ArticleViruses2021

African Swine Fever Re-Emerging in Estonia: The Role of Seropositive Wild Boar from an Epidemiological Perspective.

Katja Schulz, Jana Schulz, Christoph Staubach, Sandra Blome, Imbi Nurmoja, Franz J Conraths, Carola Sauter-Louis, Arvo Viltrop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamics of the African Swine Fever Spread in Poland.Journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katja SchulzInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17498 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1816-6554
Jana SchulzInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17498 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-4542
Christoph StaubachInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17498 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Sandra BlomeInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17498 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5465-5609
Imbi NurmojaEstonian Veterinary and Food Laboratory (VFL), Kreutzwaldi 30, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Franz J ConrathsInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17498 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-9409
Carola Sauter-LouisInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17498 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-1933
Arvo ViltropInstitute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Science, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51014 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-980X
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEEstonian University of Life Sciences · EEVeterinary and Food Board · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) emerged in Estonia in 2014. From February 2019 to August 2020, no pigs or wild boar tested positive for ASF virus (ASFV), only ASFV-specific antibodies could be detected in shot wild boar. However, ASF recently re-emerged in wild boar. We tested three hypotheses that might explain the current situation: (i) ASFV may have been present throughout, but at a prevalence below the detection limit; (ii) seropositive wild boar may have remained infectious (i.e., virus-carriers) and kept the epidemic going; or (iii) ASF was gone for 1.5 years, but was recently re-introduced. Using Estonian surveillance data, the sensitivity of the surveillance system and the confidence in freedom from ASF were estimated. Furthermore, the detection probability was determined and cluster analyses were performed to investigate the role of serological positive wild boar. The results suggest that the surveillance system was not able to detect virus circulation at a design prevalence below 1%. With respect to the confidence in freedom from ASF, the results indicate that circulating virus should have been detected over time, if the prevalence was ≥2%. However, the decreasing wild boar population density and ongoing surveillance activities made ASFV circulation at a low prevalence unlikely. Cluster analyses provided no evidence for a significant accumulation of serologically positive wild boar in temporal connection to the re-emergence of ASFV. Further targeted research, such as long-term experimental studies and molecular epidemiology, is necessary to improve our knowledge on the epidemiology of ASF and to control the disease more effectively.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCommunicable Diseases, EmergingEpidemicsEstoniaSeroepidemiologic StudiesSus scrofaSwineAntibodies, ViralAfrican swine feverASFV-carriercluster analysisconfidence in freedomdetection probabilityEstoniasensitivity of surveillancewild boar

Identifiers

PMID34834928
PMCPMC8625046
OpenAlexW3207159057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.