Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834656›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Assessing the Response of Diverse Sesame Genotypes to Waterlogging Durations at Different Plant Growth Stages.

Mohammad Habibullah, Shahnaz Sarkar, Mohammad Mahbub Islam, Kamal Uddin Ahmed, Md Zillur Rahman, Mohamed F Awad, Abdelaleim I ElSayed, Elsayed Mansour, Md Sazzad Hossain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The down-regulation of MsWOX13-2 promotes enhanced waterlogging resilience in alfalfa.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad HabibullahDepartment of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Shahnaz SarkarDepartment of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Mahbub IslamDepartment of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Kamal Uddin AhmedDepartment of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Md Zillur RahmanDepartment of Agronomy and Haor Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Mohamed F AwadDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-9164
Abdelaleim I ElSayedDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1345-0233
Elsayed MansourDepartment of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2987-4441
Md Sazzad HossainDepartment of Agronomy and Haor Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4507-2783
Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University · BDSylhet Agricultural University · BDZagazig University · EGTaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sesame is sensitive to waterlogging, and its growth is devastatingly impacted under excess moisture conditions. Thus, waterlogging tolerance is crucial to alleviate yield constraints, particularly under expected climate change. In this study, 119 diverse sesame genotypes were screened for their tolerance to 12, 24, 48, and 72 h of waterlogging relative to non-waterlogged conditions. All plants died under 72 h of waterlogging, while 13.45%, 31.93%, and 45.38% of genotypes survived at 48, 24, and 12 h, respectively. Based on the seedling parameters and waterlogging tolerance coefficients, genotypes BD-7008 and BD-6985 exhibited the highest tolerance to waterlogging, while BD-6996 and JP-01811 were the most sensitive ones. The responses of these four genotypes to waterlogged conditions were assessed at different plant growth stages-30, 40, and 50 days after sowing (DAS)-versus normal conditions. Waterlogging, particularly when it occurred within 30 DAS, destructively affected the physiological and morphological characteristics, which was reflected in the growth and yield attributes. Genotype BD-7008, followed by BD-6985, exhibited the highest chlorophyll and proline contents as well as enzymatic antioxidant activities, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT). These biochemical and physiological adjustments ameliorated the adverse effects of waterlogging, resulting in higher yields for both genotypes. Conversely, JP-01811 presented the lowest chlorophyll and proline contents as well as enzymatic antioxidant activities, resulting in the poorest growth and seed yield.

Indexed as

genotypesgrowthprincipal component analysissesametolerancewaterloggingyield

Identifiers

PMID34834656
PMCPMC8618815
OpenAlexW3210548748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.