Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834529›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

LASSO and Bioinformatics Analysis in the Identification of Key Genes for Prognostic Genes of Gynecologic Cancer.

Shao-Hua Yu, Jia-Hua Cai, De-Lun Chen, Szu-Han Liao, Yi-Zhen Lin, Yu-Ting Chung, Jeffrey J P Tsai, Charles C N Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Wrangling Real-World Data: Optimizing Clinical Research Through Factor Selection with LASSO Regression.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Regulation of KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shao-Hua YuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1072-7935
Jia-Hua CaiInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
De-Lun ChenDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.
Szu-Han LiaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.
Yi-Zhen LinDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asia University Hospital, Taichung 413505, Taiwan.
Jeffrey J P TsaiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.
Charles C N WangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7305-3061
Asia University · TWChina Medical University · TWInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

Asia University ASIA-108-CMUH-18China Medical University Hospital ASIA-108-CMUH-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of gynecologic cancer in order to improve survival. Cervical cancer (CC) and endometrial cancer (EC) are the most common malignant tumors of gynecologic cancer among women in the world. As the underlying molecular mechanisms in both cervical and endometrial cancer remain unclear, a comprehensive and systematic bioinformatics analysis is required. In our study, gene expression profiles of GSE9750, GES7803, GES63514, GES17025, GES115810, and GES36389 downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were utilized to analyze differential gene expression between cancer and normal tissues. A total of 78 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) common to CC and EC were identified to perform the functional enrichment analyses, including gene ontology and pathway analysis. KEGG pathway analysis of 78 DEGs indicated that three main types of pathway participate in the mechanism of gynecologic cancer such as drug metabolism, signal transduction, and tumorigenesis and development. Furthermore, 20 diagnostic signatures were confirmed using the least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 10-fold cross validation. Finally, we used the GEPIA2 online tool to verify the expression of 20 genes selected by the LASSO regression model. Among them, the expression of PAMR1 and SLC24A3 in tumor tissues was downregulated significantly compared to the normal tissue, and found to be statistically significant in survival rates between the CC and EC of patients (

Indexed as

bioinformaticscervical cancerendometrial cancerLASSO regressionprognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34834529
PMCPMC8617991
OpenAlexW3213175427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.