ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Improved Deep Convolutional Neural Network to Classify Osteoarthritis from Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Studies.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Review
- Self-supervised learning with BYOL for anterior cruciate ligament tear detection from knee MRI.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Hierarchical classification of anterior cruciate ligament using deep learning for athletes healthcare.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Article
- One-stop detection of anterior cruciate ligament injuries on magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning with multicenter validation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Improving inceptionV4 model based on fractional-order snow leopard optimization algorithm for diagnosing of ACL tears.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Approaching expert-level accuracy for differentiating ACL tear types on MRI with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- MGACA-Net: a novel deep learning based multi-scale guided attention and context aggregation for localization of knee anterior cruciate ligament tears region in MRI images.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Automated Knee MR Images Segmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A deep learning approach for anterior cruciate ligament rupture localization on knee MR images.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Assessing Deep Learning Techniques for the Recognition of Tropical Disease in Images from Parasitological Exams.Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2022Article
- Machine Learning-Based Performance Comparison to Diagnose Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- A Torn ACL Mapping in Knee MRI Images Using Deep Convolution Neural Network with Inception-v3.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Early Detection of Medical Image Analysis by Using Machine Learning Method.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is caused by partially or completely torn ACL ligament in the knee, especially in sportsmen. There is a need to classify the ACL tear before it fully ruptures to avoid osteoarthritis. This research aims to identify ACL tears automatically and efficiently with a deep learning approach. A dataset was gathered, consisting of 917 knee magnetic resonance images (MRI) from Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia. The dataset we used consists of three classes: non-injured, partial tears, and fully ruptured knee MRI. The study compares and evaluates two variants of convolutional neural networks (CNN). We first tested the standard CNN model of five layers and then a customized CNN model of eleven layers. Eight different hyper-parameters were adjusted and tested on both variants. Our customized CNN model showed good results after a 25% random split using RMSprop and a learning rate of 0.001. The average evaluations are measured by accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score in the case of the standard CNN using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001, i.e., 96.3%, 95%, 96%, 96.9%, and 95.6%, respectively. In the case of the customized CNN model, using the same evaluation measures, the model performed at 98.6%, 98%, 98%, 98.5%, and 98%, respectively, using an RMSprop optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001. Moreover, we also present our results on the receiver operating curve and area under the curve (ROC AUC). The customized CNN model with the Adam optimizer and a learning rate of 0.001 achieved 0.99 over three classes was highest among all. The model showed good results overall, and in the future, we can improve it to apply other CNN architectures to detect and segment other ligament parts like meniscus and cartilages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.