Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834515›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Improved Deep Convolutional Neural Network to Classify Osteoarthritis from Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Mazhar Javed Awan, Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim, Naomie Salim, Amjad Rehman, Haitham Nobanee, Hassan Shabir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early Detection of Medical Image Analysis by Using Machine Learning Method.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mazhar Javed AwanSchool of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3535-8005
Mohd Shafry Mohd RahimSchool of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia.
Naomie SalimSchool of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia.
Amjad RehmanArtificial Intelligence and Data Analytics Research Laboratory, CCIS, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia.
Haitham NobaneeCollege of Business, Abu Dhabi University, P.O. Box 59911, Abu Dhabi 59911, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-4424-5600
Hassan ShabirDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54770, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is caused by partially or completely torn ACL ligament in the knee, especially in sportsmen. There is a need to classify the ACL tear before it fully ruptures to avoid osteoarthritis. This research aims to identify ACL tears automatically and efficiently with a deep learning approach. A dataset was gathered, consisting of 917 knee magnetic resonance images (MRI) from Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia. The dataset we used consists of three classes: non-injured, partial tears, and fully ruptured knee MRI. The study compares and evaluates two variants of convolutional neural networks (CNN). We first tested the standard CNN model of five layers and then a customized CNN model of eleven layers. Eight different hyper-parameters were adjusted and tested on both variants. Our customized CNN model showed good results after a 25% random split using RMSprop and a learning rate of 0.001. The average evaluations are measured by accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score in the case of the standard CNN using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001, i.e., 96.3%, 95%, 96%, 96.9%, and 95.6%, respectively. In the case of the customized CNN model, using the same evaluation measures, the model performed at 98.6%, 98%, 98%, 98.5%, and 98%, respectively, using an RMSprop optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001. Moreover, we also present our results on the receiver operating curve and area under the curve (ROC AUC). The customized CNN model with the Adam optimizer and a learning rate of 0.001 achieved 0.99 over three classes was highest among all. The model showed good results overall, and in the future, we can improve it to apply other CNN architectures to detect and segment other ligament parts like meniscus and cartilages.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentclassificationconvolutional neural networkdeep learningdiagnosishealthcarehuman and healthknee boneosteoarthritispublic healthradiographic image analysis

Identifiers

PMID34834515
PMCPMC8617867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.