ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021
Non-Invasive Assessment of Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction: Where Do We Stand?
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improvement of Hemodynamics and Quality of Life Before and After Interatrial Shunt Devices Implantation for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Innovative strategies to reduce heart failure hospitalizations: insights from the ESC heart failure congress 2026.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Calculation of Ejection Fraction Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: Clinical Evolution, Reliability, and Technological Challenges-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Rethinking ejection fraction for anesthesiologists: a narrative review.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Imaging-based detection and prediction of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity: a narrative review.BJR open · 2026Review
- When the Liver Echoes to the Heart: Assessing Subclinical Cardiac Dysfunction in NAFLD Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Predicting in-hospital indicators from wearable-derived signals for cardiovascular and respiratory disease monitoring: An in silico study.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Myocardial Strain Measurements Obtained with Fast-Strain-Encoded Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Risk Prediction and Early Detection of Chemotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity Compared to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Intracardiac fluid dynamic analysis: available techniques and novel clinical applications.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Review
- Importance of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Applied to Congenital Heart Diseases in Pediatric Age: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life among Patients with Heart Failure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Prognostic value of the left ventricular ejection fraction reserve acquired by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with CAD and reduced stress LVEF.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance in ischemic cardiomyopathy: present role and future directions.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction for decision-making.Future cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is the preferred parameter applied for the non-invasive evaluation of LV systolic function in clinical practice. It has a well-recognized and extensive role in the clinical management of numerous cardiac conditions. Many imaging modalities are currently available for the non-invasive assessment of LVEF. The aim of this review is to describe their relative advantages and disadvantages, proposing a hierarchical application of the different imaging tests available for LVEF evaluation based on the level of accuracy/reproducibility clinically required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.