Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834426›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021

Effectiveness of Stretching in Post-Stroke Spasticity and Range of Motion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laura Gomez-Cuaresma, David Lucena-Anton, Gloria Gonzalez-Medina, Francisco Javier Martin-Vega, Alejandro Galan-Mercant, Carlos Luque-Moreno

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [The research progress on the improvement effect of repeated peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb and lower limb spasm after stroke].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Gomez-CuaresmaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain.
David Lucena-AntonDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-5342
Gloria Gonzalez-MedinaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5850-3055
Francisco Javier Martin-VegaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain.
Alejandro Galan-MercantDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-0372
Carlos Luque-MorenoDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5209-3382
Universidad de Cádiz · ES

Funding

Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership for Higher Education Program (Key Action 203) 2018-1-PL01-KA203-051055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity is one of the most frequent and disabling clinical manifestations of patients with stroke. In clinical practice, stretching is the most widely used physiotherapeutic intervention for this population. However, there is no solid evidence for its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of stretching in reducing post-stroke spasticity. Research was carried out until March 2021 in the following scientific databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PEDro. The PEDro scale and the Cochrane collaboration tool were used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the studies. Eight articles were selected for qualitative analysis; six of them contributed information to the meta-analysis. No conclusive evidence was obtained on the effectiveness of stretching in terms of treating spasticity and range of motion in patients with stroke. Further research is necessary in order to determine the effectiveness of the use of stretching in this population, considering the different types of stretching (static and dynamic), the time of application, the measurement of the different components of spasticity, and the extrapolation of functional results.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingmuscle spasticitymuscle stretching exercisesstroke

Identifiers

PMID34834426
PMCPMC8619362
OpenAlexW3210208454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.