Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834326›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Tropism of Extracellular Vesicles and Cell-Derived Nanovesicles to Normal and Cancer Cells: New Perspectives in Tumor-Targeted Nucleic Acid Delivery.

Anastasiya Oshchepkova, Oleg Markov, Evgeniy Evtushenko, Alexander Chernonosov, Elena Kiseleva, Ksenia Morozova, Vera Matveeva, Lyudmila Artemyeva, Valentin Vlassov, Marina Zenkova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasiya OshchepkovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-0328
Oleg MarkovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Evgeniy EvtushenkoFaculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1264-4770
Alexander ChernonosovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8362-2443
Elena KiselevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ksenia MorozovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3307-8819
Vera MatveevaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Lyudmila ArtemyevaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Valentin VlassovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Marina ZenkovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4044-1049
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RUInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-74-30011Russian State funded budget 0245-2021-0004Russian State funded budget 0259-2021-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main advantage of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a drug carrier system is their low immunogenicity and internalization by mammalian cells. EVs are often considered a cell-specific delivery system, but the production of preparative amounts of EVs for therapeutic applications is challenging due to their laborious isolation and purification procedures. Alternatively, mimetic vesicles prepared from the cellular plasma membrane can be used in the same way as natural EVs. For example, a cytoskeleton-destabilizing agent, such as cytochalasin B, allows the preparation of membrane vesicles by a series of centrifugations. Here, we prepared cytochalasin-B-inducible nanovesicles (CINVs) of various cellular origins and studied their tropism in different mammalian cells. We observed that CINVs derived from human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells exhibited an enhanced affinity to epithelial cancer cells compared to myeloid, lymphoid or neuroblastoma cancer cells. The dendritic cell-derived CINVs were taken up by all studied cell lines with a similar efficiency that differed from the behavior of DC-derived EVs. The ability of cancer cells to internalize CINVs was mainly determined by the properties of recipient cells, and the cellular origin of CINVs was less important. In addition, receptor-mediated interactions were shown to be necessary for the efficient uptake of CINVs. We found that CINVs, derived from late apoptotic/necrotic cells (aCINVs) are internalized by in myelogenous (K562) 10-fold more efficiently than CINVs, and interact much less efficiently with melanocytic (B16) or epithelial (KB-3-1) cancer cells. Finally, we found that CINVs caused a temporal and reversible drop of the rate of cell division, which restored to the level of control cells with a 24 h delay.

Indexed as

apoptosiscytochalasin Bdendritic cellsextracellular vesiclesmesenchymal stem cellsnucleic acid deliverytumor cellsvesicle mimetic

Identifiers

PMID34834326
PMCPMC8621453
OpenAlexW3214096544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.