ArticlePharmaceutics2021
Preparation and Evaluation of a Powdered Rebamipide Mouthwash as In-Hospital Formulation: Considering Dispersion before Use in Patients.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Porphyrin Photosensitizers into Polysaccharide-Based Biopolymer Hydrogels for Topical Photodynamic Therapy: Physicochemical and Pharmacotechnical Assessments.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Formulation and Development of Bioadhesive Oral Films ContainingPharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Japan, rebamipide (RB) mouthwash (RB-MW) for oral mucositis induced by cancer chemotherapy has been prepared using in-hospital formulation. Usually, RB-MW is prepared by dispersing crushed commercial RB tablets in the dispersion medium; however, uniformity is difficult to obtain due to low solubility. The current study aims is to prepare homogenously dispersed formulations using the fine particles of crushed tablets by a method that is convenient for hospital use. Commercial RB tablets were pre-milled at different milling times as "RB-Ts". A ground mixture was then prepared by co-grinding the RB-Ts with HPC-L or PVP K30 via a benchtop ball milling machine (MM400). The physicochemical properties of samples were evaluated for PXRD, FTIR, turbidity, particle size, and solubility. Although the milling of RB tablets decreased the crystallinity, the length of milling time did not affect them. In contrast, grinding using MM400 significantly decreased RB crystallinity; their PXRD patterns showed a halo, suggesting the amorphization of RB crystals by grinding. Although solubility and turbidity seemed to be affected by the type of polymer rather than the particle size, every ground mixture showed high dispersibility. Thus, grinding the RB-Ts with polymers appeared to be the most promising way to obtain stable dispersion as an in-hospital formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.