Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834157›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Electrospun Amphiphilic Nanofibers as Templates for In Situ Preparation of Chloramphenicol-Loaded Liposomes.

Ivo Laidmäe, Andres Meos, Irja Alainezhad Kjærvik, Sveinung G Ingebrigtsen, Nataša Škalko-Basnet, Kalle Kirsimäe, Tavo Romann, Urmas Joost, Vambola Kisand, Karin Kogermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nanoparticle-based Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Disorders.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivo LaidmäeInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-5476
Andres MeosInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Irja Alainezhad KjærvikDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Universitetsvegen 57, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Sveinung G IngebrigtsenDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Universitetsvegen 57, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Nataša Škalko-BasnetDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Universitetsvegen 57, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4301-2840
Kalle KirsimäeDepartment of Geology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Tavo RomannInstitute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Urmas JoostInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14C, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Vambola KisandInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14C, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-055X
Karin KogermannInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
University of Tartu · EEUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

EEA/Norway Grants Scholarship Programme 36-3.1/1601Estonian Research Council PRG726NordForsk 43703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hydration of phospholipids, electrospun into polymeric nanofibers and used as templates for liposome formation, offers pharmaceutical advantages as it avoids the storage of liposomes as aqueous dispersions. The objective of the present study was to electrospin and characterize amphiphilic nanofibers as templates for the preparation of antibiotic-loaded liposomes and compare this method with the conventional film-hydration method followed by extrusion. The comparison was based on particle size, encapsulation efficiency and drug-release behavior. Chloramphenicol (CAM) was used at different concentrations as a model antibacterial drug. Phosphatidylcoline (PC) with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), using ethanol as a solvent, was found to be successful in fabricating the amphiphilic composite drug-loaded nanofibers as well as liposomes with both methods. The characterization of the nanofiber templates revealed that fiber diameter did not affect the liposome size. According to the optical microscopy results, the immediate hydration of phospholipids deposited on the amphiphilic nanofibers occurred within a few seconds, resulting in the formation of liposomes in water dispersions. The liposomes appeared to aggregate more readily in the concentrated than in the diluted solutions. The drug encapsulation efficiency for the fiber-hydrated liposomes varied between 14.9 and 28.1% and, for film-hydrated liposomes, between 22.0 and 77.1%, depending on the CAM concentrations and additional extrusion steps. The nanofiber hydration method was faster, as less steps were required for the in-situ liposome preparation than in the film-hydration method. The liposomes obtained using nanofiber hydration were smaller and more homogeneous than the conventional liposomes, but less drug was encapsulated.

Indexed as

amphiphilic nanofiberschloramphenicoldrug releaseelectrospinningfilm hydrationliposome

Identifiers

PMID34834157
PMCPMC8624320
OpenAlexW3206156874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.