Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34834026›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Recording from an Identified Neuron Efficiently Reveals Hazard for Brain Function in Risk Assessment.

Peter Machnik, Stefan Schuster

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter MachnikDepartment of Animal Physiology, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4991-2137
Stefan SchusterDepartment of Animal Physiology, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0873-8996
University of Bayreuth · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Schu1470/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern societies use a continuously growing number of chemicals. Because these are released into the environment and are taken up by humans, rigorous (but practicable) risk assessment must precede the approval of new substances for commerce. A number of tests is applicable, but it has been very difficult to efficiently assay the effect of chemicals on communication and information processing in vivo in the adult vertebrate brain. Here, we suggest a straightforward way to rapidly and accurately detect effects of chemical exposure on action potential generation, synaptic transmission, central information processing, and even processing in sensory systems in vivo by recording from a single neuron. The approach is possible in an identified neuron in the hindbrain of fish that integrates various sources of information and whose properties are ideal for rapid analysis of the various effects chemicals can have on the nervous system. The analysis uses fish but, as we discuss here, key neuronal functions are conserved and differences can only be due to differences in metabolism or passage into the brain, factors that can easily be determined. Speed and efficiency of the method, therefore, make it suitable to provide information in risk assessment, as we illustrate here with the effects of bisphenols on adult brain function.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsBrainFishesHumansNeuronsPhenolsRisk AssessmentSynaptic TransmissionBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsPhenolsbisphenolbrain functioncentral nervous systemchemical safetyneuronal functionrisk assessmentrisk managementsensory systemssynaptic balancesynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID34834026
PMCPMC8622100
OpenAlexW3214089321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.