Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833855›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Carotenoids from Carrot Pomace and Their Optimization through Response Surface Methodology.

Muhammad Umair, Saqib Jabbar, Mustapha M Nasiru, Zhaoxin Lu, Jianhao Zhang, Muhammad Abid, Mian Anjum Murtaza, Marek Kieliszek, Liqing Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Soxhlet extraction ofRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Characterization of Marigold Flower (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad UmairDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, College of Chemistry and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2035-686X
Saqib JabbarFood Science Research Institute (FSRI), National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), Islamabad 46000, Pakistan.
Mustapha M NasiruCollege of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-4802
Zhaoxin LuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-7419
Jianhao ZhangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Muhammad AbidInstitute of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi 44000, Pakistan.
Mian Anjum MurtazaInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-7397
Marek KieliszekDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-4865
Liqing ZhaoDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, College of Chemistry and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNPakistan Agricultural Research Council · PKPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKShenzhen University · CNUniversity of Sargodha · PKWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

Science and Technology Support Program of Guizhou province NO.[2021]Genaral410This work was supported by the Special Fund for Development of Strategic Emerging Industries in Shenzhen JCYJ20190808145613154, KQJSCX20180328100801771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was used to extract carotenoids from the carrot pomace. To investigate the effect of independent variables on the UAE, the response surface methodology (RSM) with central-composite design (CCD) was employed. The study was conducted with three independent variables including extraction time (min), temperature (°C), and ethanol concentration (%). The results showed that the optimal conditions for UAE were achieved with an extraction time of 17 min, temperature of 32 °C, and ethanol concentration of 51% of total carotenoids (31.82 ± 0.55); extraction time of 16 min, temperature of 29 °C, and ethanol concentration of 59% for a combination of β-carotene (14.89 ± 0.40), lutein (5.77 ± 0.19), and lycopene (2.65 ± 0.12). The non-significant (

Indexed as

SonicationCarotenoidsDaucus carotaCarotenoidscarrot pomaceresponse surface methodologytotal carotenoidsultrasound assisted extractionβ-carotene

Identifiers

PMID34833855
PMCPMC8618288
OpenAlexW3212819518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.