Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833793›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Zernike Moment Based Classification of Cosmic Ray Candidate Hits from CMOS Sensors.

Olaf Bar, Łukasz Bibrzycki, Michał Niedźwiecki, Marcin Piekarczyk, Krzysztof Rzecki, Tomasz Sośnicki, Sławomir Stuglik, Michał Frontczak, Piotr Homola, David E Alvarez-Castillo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Olaf BarInstitute of Computer Science, Pedagogical University of Krakow, 30-084 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-5423
Łukasz BibrzyckiInstitute of Computer Science, Pedagogical University of Krakow, 30-084 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-4894
Michał NiedźwieckiDepartment of Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-9133
Marcin PiekarczykInstitute of Computer Science, Pedagogical University of Krakow, 30-084 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-9955
Krzysztof RzeckiDepartment of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6834-2344
Tomasz SośnickiDepartment of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-7971
Sławomir StuglikInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-342 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5490-0835
Michał FrontczakInstitute of Computer Science, Pedagogical University of Krakow, 30-084 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5264-4508
Piotr HomolaInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-342 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-9948
David E Alvarez-CastilloInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-342 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1874-8116
Thomas AndersenNSCIR, Thornbury, ON N0H2P0, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-4124
Arman TursunovInstitute of Physics, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo nám 13, 74601 Opava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-5487

Funding

International Visegrad Fund 21920298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable tools for artefact rejection and signal classification are a must for cosmic ray detection experiments based on CMOS technology. In this paper, we analyse the fitness of several feature-based statistical classifiers for the classification of particle candidate hits in four categories: spots, tracks, worms and artefacts. We use Zernike moments of the image function as feature carriers and propose a preprocessing and denoising scheme to make the feature extraction more efficient. As opposed to convolution neural network classifiers, the feature-based classifiers allow for establishing a connection between features and geometrical properties of candidate hits. Apart from basic classifiers we also consider their ensemble extensions and find these extensions generally better performing than basic versions, with an average recognition accuracy of 88%.

Indexed as

ArtifactsNeural Networks, ComputerCMOS sensorscomputer visionfeature-based classificationmachine learningZernike moments

Identifiers

PMID34833793
PMCPMC8618806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.