Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833766›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Validity and Sensitivity of an Inertial Measurement Unit-Driven Biomechanical Model of Motor Variability for Gait.

Christopher A Bailey, Thomas K Uchida, Julie Nantel, Ryan B Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher A BaileySchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3743-5297
Thomas K UchidaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Julie NantelSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-9222
Ryan B GrahamSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7502-8065

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2016-04928Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2020-04748Ontario Early Researcher Awards ER16-12-206Ontario Early Researcher Awards ER17-13-007uOttawa-Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor variability in gait is frequently linked to fall risk, yet field-based biomechanical joint evaluations are scarce. We evaluated the validity and sensitivity of an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-driven biomechanical model of joint angle variability for gait. Fourteen healthy young adults completed seven-minute trials of treadmill gait at several speeds and arm swing amplitudes. Trunk, pelvis, and lower-limb joint kinematics were estimated by IMU- and optoelectronic-based models using OpenSim. We calculated range of motion (ROM), magnitude of variability (meanSD), local dynamic stability (λ

Indexed as

Ankle JointGaitAnkleBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansRange of Motion, ArticularWalkingYoung Adultgaitinertial measurement unitjoint kinematicslocal dynamic stabilityOpenSimpersistenceregularitystride-to-stride variability

Identifiers

PMID34833766
PMCPMC8626040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.