Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833755›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Validation of a Sensor-Based Gait Analysis System with a Gold-Standard Motion Capture System in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Verena Jakob, Arne Küderle, Felix Kluge, Jochen Klucken, Bjoern M Eskofier, Jürgen Winkler, Martin Winterholler, Heiko Gassner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Creating Refined Datasets for Better Chaos Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Accuracy validation of a wearable IMU-based gait analysis in healthy female.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Verena JakobMovement and Gait Lab, Sana-Krankenhaus Rummelsberg, 90592 Schwarzenbruck, Germany.
Arne KüderleMachine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5686-281X
Felix KlugeMachine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4921-6104
Jochen KluckenDigital Medicine, University of Luxembourg, 4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Bjoern M EskofierMachine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0417-0336
Jürgen WinklerDepartment of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Martin WinterhollerDepartment of Neurology, Sana-Krankenhaus Rummelsberg, 90592 Schwarzenbruck, Germany.
Heiko GassnerDepartment of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2037-9460
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DESana Klinikum · DEUniversity of Luxembourg · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technologies provide the opportunity to analyze gait patterns in patients with Parkinson's Disease using wearable sensors in clinical settings and a home environment. Confirming the technical validity of inertial sensors with a 3D motion capture system is a necessary step for the clinical application of sensor-based gait analysis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare gait parameters measured by a mobile sensor-based gait analysis system and a motion capture system as the gold standard. Gait parameters of 37 patients were compared between both systems after performing a standardized 5 × 10 m walking test by reliability analysis using intra-class correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Additionally, gait parameters of an age-matched healthy control group (

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseGaitGait AnalysisHumansReproducibility of ResultsWalkinginertial sensorsmachine learning algorithmParkinson’s diseasespatiotemporal gait parametersthree-dimensional gait analysiswearables

Identifiers

PMID34833755
PMCPMC8623101
OpenAlexW3212815896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.