Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833742›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Mobile Eye-Tracking Data Analysis Using Object Detection via YOLO v4.

Niharika Kumari, Verena Ruf, Sergey Mukhametov, Albrecht Schmidt, Jochen Kuhn, Stefan Küchemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shifting Perspectives: A proposed framework for analyzing head-mounted eye-tracking data with dynamic areas of interest and dynamic scenes.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Platelet Detection Based on Improved YOLO_v3.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niharika KumariPhysics Education Research Group, Physics Department, TU Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-322X
Verena RufPhysics Education Research Group, Physics Department, TU Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-7621
Sergey MukhametovPhysics Education Research Group, Physics Department, TU Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-1462
Albrecht SchmidtMediainformatics Group, Institute of Informatics, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Jochen KuhnPhysics Education Research Group, Physics Department, TU Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-3218
Stefan KüchemannPhysics Education Research Group, Physics Department, TU Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2729-1592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote eye tracking has become an important tool for the online analysis of learning processes. Mobile eye trackers can even extend the range of opportunities (in comparison to stationary eye trackers) to real settings, such as classrooms or experimental lab courses. However, the complex and sometimes manual analysis of mobile eye-tracking data often hinders the realization of extensive studies, as this is a very time-consuming process and usually not feasible for real-world situations in which participants move or manipulate objects. In this work, we explore the opportunities to use object recognition models to assign mobile eye-tracking data for real objects during an authentic students' lab course. In a comparison of three different Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), a Faster Region-Based-CNN, you only look once (YOLO) v3, and YOLO v4, we found that YOLO v4, together with an optical flow estimation, provides the fastest results with the highest accuracy for object detection in this setting. The automatic assignment of the gaze data to real objects simplifies the time-consuming analysis of mobile eye-tracking data and offers an opportunity for real-time system responses to the user's gaze. Additionally, we identify and discuss several problems in using object detection for mobile eye-tracking data that need to be considered.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerVisual Perceptioneye movementseye trackingFaster R-CNNobject detectionphysics experimentsYOLO

Identifiers

PMID34833742
PMCPMC8621024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.