Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833697›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

An Open-Source Wireless Sensor Node Platform with Active Node-Level Reliability for Monitoring Applications.

Dominik Widhalm, Karl M Goeschka, Wolfgang Kastner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dominik WidhalmDepartment Electronic Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, 1200 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7461-0918
Karl M GoeschkaDepartment Electronic Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang KastnerAutomation Systems Group, Faculty of Informatics, TU Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5420-404X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In wireless sensor networks, the quality of the provided data is influenced by the properties of the sensor nodes. Often deployed in large numbers, they usually consist of low-cost components where failures are the norm, even more so in harsh outdoor environments. Current fault detection techniques, however, consider the sensor data alone and neglect vital information from the nodes' hard- and software. As a consequence, they can not distinguish between rare data anomalies caused by proper events in the sensed data on one side and fault-induced data distortion on the other side. In this paper, we contribute with a novel, open-source sensor node platform for monitoring applications such as environmental monitoring. For long battery life, it comprises mainly low-power components. In contrast to other sensor nodes, our platform provides self-diagnostic measures to enable active node-level reliability. The entire sensor node platform including the hardware and software components has been implemented and is publicly available and free to use for everyone. Based on an extensive and long-running practical experiment setup, we show that the detectability of node faults is improved and the distinction between rare but proper events and fault-induced data distortion is indeed possible. We also show that these measures have a negligible overhead on the node's energy efficiency and hardware costs. This improves the overall reliability of wireless sensor networks with both, long battery life and high-quality data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsWireless TechnologyElectric Power SuppliesReproducibility of Resultsenergy-efficiencyfault diagnosisnode-levelsensor nodewireless sensor network

Identifiers

PMID34833697
PMCPMC8623445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.