Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34833685›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Insect-Inspired Robots: Bridging Biological and Artificial Systems.

Poramate Manoonpong, Luca Patanè, Xiaofeng Xiong, Ilya Brodoline, Julien Dupeyroux, Stéphane Viollet, Paolo Arena, Julien R Serres

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Poramate ManoonpongEmbodied Artificial Intelligence and Neurorobotics Laboratory, SDU Biorobotics, The Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4806-7576
Luca PatanèDepartment of Engineering, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5488-9365
Xiaofeng XiongEmbodied Artificial Intelligence and Neurorobotics Laboratory, SDU Biorobotics, The Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-3498
Ilya BrodolineDepartment of Biorobotics, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, ISM, CEDEX 07, 13284 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3688-7902
Julien DupeyrouxFaculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 52600 Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7414-5021
Stéphane ViolletDepartment of Biorobotics, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, ISM, CEDEX 07, 13284 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1585-9822
Paolo ArenaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-5729
Julien R SerresDepartment of Biorobotics, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, ISM, CEDEX 07, 13284 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2840-7932
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKDelft University of Technology · NLUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Brødrene Hartmanns and Thomas B. Thriges 7648-2106Brødrene Hartmanns and Thomas B. Thriges A36775French National Centre for Scientific Research PEPS INSIS 2020International Human Frontier Science Program Organization RGP0002/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article aims to address common research questions in hexapod robotics. How can we build intelligent autonomous hexapod robots that can exploit their biomechanics, morphology, and computational systems, to achieve autonomy, adaptability, and energy efficiency comparable to small living creatures, such as insects? Are insects good models for building such intelligent hexapod robots because they are the only animals with six legs? This review article is divided into three main sections to address these questions, as well as to assist roboticists in identifying relevant and future directions in the field of hexapod robotics over the next decade. After an introduction in section (1), the sections will respectively cover the following three key areas: (2) biomechanics focused on the design of smart legs; (3) locomotion control; and (4) high-level cognition control. These interconnected and interdependent areas are all crucial to improving the level of performance of hexapod robotics in terms of energy efficiency, terrain adaptability, autonomy, and operational range. We will also discuss how the next generation of bioroboticists will be able to transfer knowledge from biology to robotics and vice versa.

Indexed as

RoboticsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaInsectaLocomotionbiomimetismbiomimicrybionicsbioroboticshexapodlegged robotics

Identifiers

PMID34833685
PMCPMC8623770
OpenAlexW3214346858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.