ReviewPolymers2021
Syngas Fermentation for the Production of Bio-Based Polymers: A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production, Volume 4.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Syngas Fermentation for Recovery of High-Value Resources: A Comprehensive Review.Current pollution reports · 2025Review
- Integrated Biorefinery for a Next-Generation Methanization Process Focusing on Volatile Fatty Acid Valorization: A Critical Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Composition of Lignocellulose Hydrolysate in Different Biorefinery Strategies: Nutrients and Inhibitors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biobutanol production from underutilized substrates usingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Industrial side streams as sustainable substrates for microbial production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB).World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing environmental awareness among the general public and legislators has driven this modern era to seek alternatives to fossil-derived products such as fuel and plastics. Addressing environmental issues through bio-based products driven from microbial fermentation of synthetic gas (syngas) could be a future endeavor, as this could result in both fuel and plastic in the form of bioethanol and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Abundant availability in the form of cellulosic, lignocellulosic, and other organic and inorganic wastes presents syngas catalysis as an interesting topic for commercialization. Fascination with syngas fermentation is trending, as it addresses the limitations of conventional technologies like direct biochemical conversion and Fischer-Tropsch's method for the utilization of lignocellulosic biomass. A plethora of microbial strains is available for syngas fermentation and PHA production, which could be exploited either in an axenic form or in a mixed culture. These microbes constitute diverse biochemical pathways supported by the activity of hydrogenase and carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH), thus resulting in product diversity. There are always possibilities of enzymatic regulation and/or gene tailoring to enhance the process's effectiveness. PHA productivity drags the techno-economical perspective of syngas fermentation, and this is further influenced by syngas impurities, gas-liquid mass transfer (GLMT), substrate or product inhibition, downstream processing, etc. Product variation and valorization could improve the economical perspective and positively impact commercial sustainability. Moreover, choices of single-stage or multi-stage fermentation processes upon product specification followed by microbial selection could be perceptively optimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.