Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34832365›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Accuracy in Cement Hydration Investigations: Combined X-ray Microtomography and Powder Diffraction Analyses.

Inés R Salcedo, Ana Cuesta, Shiva Shirani, Laura León-Reina, Miguel A G Aranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inés R SalcedoServicios Centrales de Apoyo a la Investigación, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9986-6805
Ana CuestaDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Cristalografía y Mineralogía, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8634-2241
Shiva ShiraniDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Cristalografía y Mineralogía, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6877-7375
Laura León-ReinaServicios Centrales de Apoyo a la Investigación, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9306-4921
Miguel A G ArandaDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Cristalografía y Mineralogía, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7708-3578

Funding

Ministry of Science and Innovation. Spain PID2019-104378RJ-I00Ministry of Science and Innovation. Spain PID2020-114650RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cement hydration is a very complex set of processes. The evolution of the crystalline phases during hydration can be accurately followed by X-ray powder diffraction data evaluated by the Rietveld method. However, accurate measurements of some microstructural features, including porosity and amorphous content developments, are more challenging. Here, we combine laboratory X-ray powder diffraction and computed microtomography (μCT) to better understand the results of the μCT analyses. Two pastes with different water-cement ratios, 0.45 and 0.65, filled within capillaries of two sizes, ϕ = 0.5 and 1.0 mm, were analysed at 50 days of hydration. It was shown that within the spatial resolution of the measured μCTs, ~2 μm, the water capillary porosity was segmented within the hydrated component fraction. The unhydrated part could be accurately quantified within 2 vol% error. This work is a first step to accurately determining selected hydration features like the hydration degree of amorphous phases of supplementary cementitious materials within cement blends.

Indexed as

3D image segmentationmicrostructureporosityPortland cementsRietveld method

Identifiers

PMID34832365
PMCPMC8625441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.