Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34832347›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Biomolecular, Histological, Clinical, and Radiological Analyses of Dental Implant Bone Sites Prepared Using Magnetic Mallet Technology: A Pilot Study in Animals.

Gianmario Schierano, Domenico Baldi, Bruno Peirone, Mitzy Mauthe von Degerfeld, Roberto Navone, Alberto Bragoni, Jacopo Colombo, Riccardo Autelli, Giuliana Muzio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gianmario SchieranoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, Via Nizza 230, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1271-3334
Domenico BaldiDepartment of Surgical Science (DISC), Division of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Bruno PeironeDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095 Torino, Italy.
Mitzy Mauthe von DegerfeldDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2884-3360
Roberto NavoneDepartment of Medical Science, University of Turin, Via Santena 5, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Alberto BragoniDepartment of Medical Science, University of Turin, Via Santena 5, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Jacopo ColomboDepartment of Surgical Science (DISC), Division of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Riccardo AutelliDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7942-5268
Giuliana MuzioDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2730-1957
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA new instrumentation exploiting magneto-dynamic technology (mallet) proposed for implant site preparation was investigated.

methodsIn the tibias of three minipigs, two sites were prepared by mallet and two by drill technique. Primary stability (ISQ) was detected after implant positioning (T0) and at 14 days (T14). X-rays and computed tomography were performed. At T14, bone samples were utilized for histological and biomolecular analyses.

resultsIn mallet sites, histological evaluations evidenced a significant increase in the newly formed bone, osteoblast number, and a smaller quantity of fibrous tissue. These results agree with the significant BMP-4 augmentation and the positive trend in other osteogenic factors (biological and radiological investigations). Major, albeit IL-10-controlled, inflammation was present. For both techniques, at T14 a significant ISQ increase was evidenced, but no significant difference was observed at T0 and T14 between the mallet and drill techniques. In mallet sites, lateral bone condensation was observed on computed tomography.

conclusionsUsing biological, histological, clinical, and radiological analyses, this study first shows that the mallet technique is effective for implant site preparation. Based on its ability to cause osseocondensation and improve newly formed bone, mallet technology should be chosen in all clinical cases of poor bone quality.

Indexed as

dental implantsdrill techniqueimplant stability quotientinflammationmallet techniqueosteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID34832347
PMCPMC8618607
OpenAlexW3213513069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.